What is wrong with the senate?

Do you see anything wrong with this? Maybe it could be corrected by combining some of the lesser populated states? North, Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and Utah would make a nicely populated state. Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire would still be a small state. While we are at it, just give Rhode Island as a county to Massachusetts; Delaware and Maryland to Virginia and throw in West Virginia for good measure.

Size rank	State	Population	number of Senators
37	West Virginia	1,852,994	2
38	Nebraska	1,826,341	2
39	Idaho	1,567,582	2
40	Hawaii	1,360,301	2
41	Maine	1,328,361	2
42	New Hampshire	1,316,470	2
43	Rhode Island	1,052,567	2
44	Montana	989,415	2
45	Delaware	897,934	2
46	South Dakota	814,180	2
47	Alaska	710,231	2
48	North Dakota	672,591	2
49	Vermont	625,741	2
50	Wyoming	563,626	2
		15,578,334	28
		Average population/senator	556,369
Size rank	State	Population	number of Senators
1	California	37,253,956	2
2	Texas	25,145,561	2
3	New York	19,378,102	2
4	Florida	18,801,310	2
5	Illinois	12,830,632	2
6	Pennsylvania	12,702,379	2
7	Ohio	11,536,504	2
8	Michigan	9,883,640	2
9	Georgia	9,687,653	2
10	North Carolina	9,535,483	2
11	New Jersey	8,791,894	2
12	Virginia	8,001,024	2
13	Washington	6,724,540	2
14	Massachusetts	6,547,629	2
		196,820,307	28
		Average population/senator	7,029,297